Skip to content
Menu
Anshumani Ruddra
  • About Me
  • Videos and Talks
  • Story Stack
  • Fiction
  • Courses
  • Playbooks
Anshumani Ruddra
February 12, 2021February 12, 2021

Rethinking the Minimum Viable Product (MVP)

The MVP is dead.

The Minimum Viable Product philosophy has become corrupted. We have misunderstood its intent and diluted its core elements over the years. What we are left with is a superficial term, often thrown around in conversations around product building, with little to no understanding of the underlying principles. 

Sometimes the way to understand something is to first understand what it isn’t. An MVP is:

  1. Not an excuse to make a crappy product/ feature in name of experimentation and frugality 
  2. Not a minimum product – which isn’t a product at all 
  3. Not bereft of market context. Tesla did not start by making electric cars with wooden seats. They are competing in a market against other car manufacturers where a baseline of comfort has already been established. The “minimum” is decided by the market one operates in 
  4. The first step of the public release process. It is not the last 
  5. Supposed to be a complete solution to a problem, not a partial one (need not be a comprehensive one; more on this later) 

One of the best graphics to describe the MVP philosophy was created by Henrik Kniberg:

Each stage of the MVP process is a real marketable product. It meets a real user need (get the user from point A to B in the example above) and completes a job for the user and provides a benefit.

Maybe it is a fault with the terms “minimum” and “viable”.  Perhaps they are not intuitive enough. Let’s replace them with three words that I feel maybe more intuitive: 

  1. Beneficial
  2. Complete
  3. Delightful 

BCD – your product needs to provide a benefit to the user, should be complete in its implementation and delightful (not just functional). Let’s dig deeper: 

  1. Beneficial – each product/ feature needs to solve a real problem for the user. The benefit needs to be tangible (quantifiable) and should move a metric 
  2. Complete – the problem needs to be solved end to end. The loop has to be complete. A partial solution is not a solution. It need not be comprehensive though. A good example is Google Docs. When it began, it had only about 3% of the features of MS Word. However, these features were complete in their implementation – you could create and access your document from any browser and provide access control (read, write, comment) to other users. It wasn’t a comprehensive word processor but the things it did – it did them well
  3. Delightful – a purely functional product will not move the needle in a competitive market. User delight covers functionality, reliability, usability, and pleasurability. It is an intangible – but it influences behaviour and helps formulate opinions

…  Long live the MVP. 


By clicking submit, you agree to share your email address with the site owner and Mailchimp to receive marketing, updates, and other emails from the site owner. Use the unsubscribe link in those emails to opt out at any time.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.
Whoops! There was an error and we couldn't process your subscription. Please reload the page and try again.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)

Related

1 thought on “Rethinking the Minimum Viable Product (MVP)”

  1. Saikrishna Chavali says:
    February 17, 2021 at 8:18 am

    Adding to the comments I made on LI under your post…”Complete” portion of the BCD framework is where I think a strong-minded leader is crucial (ideally, exec but also manager/individual PM).

    My experience: In one case, we kept pushing back MVP launch to add more features as sales told us they need one more feature to be competitive in this brownfield market. In another case, sales was selling it when the product was still in beta. luckily we weren’t a public company yet. In enterprise/B2B world, individual deals can sway roadmap a lot. A strong minded leader can help reason and stay a specific course (of course, help deals by reprioritising).

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

By clicking submit, you agree to share your email address with the site owner and Mailchimp to receive marketing, updates, and other emails from the site owner. Use the unsubscribe link in those emails to opt out at any time.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.
Whoops! There was an error and we couldn't process your subscription. Please reload the page and try again.

Recent Posts

  • The Mahabharat Mega Thread
  • Do Transformers Hallucinate of Softer Skin?
  • Why Manage?

Recent Comments

  • Shortlisting Ideas - Anshumani Ruddra on Generating Ideas
  • Shruti Singh on The Fire Born
  • Karan on Product Roadmap Shapes

Archives

  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • November 2022
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • April 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • January 2016
  • July 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
©2023 Anshumani Ruddra | Powered by WordPress and Superb Themes!